KashmirConnected
  • Home
  • Publications, News
  • Articles + Reports
  • Book Reviews
  • Kashmir Journal
    • A Few Days in the Lolab Valley
    • Saints, shrines and divines
    • A Few Good Women
    • Water
    • Stories and Storytellers
    • Celebrating Kashmiri food
    • Traumatic Pasts in Kashmiri Fiction
    • The Majesty of Kashmiri Shawls
    • Multiple Meanings of Aazadi
    • Photographing Kashmir
    • 'Clash of Ideas'
    • The New Militancy
    • Kashmiri and the Languages of Kashmir
    • Srinagar
    • The spectacle/side show of Kashmir
  • RESOURCES
  • Contact

Sheikh Abdullah: 'independence ... may be the only solution'

2/2/2016

1 Comment

 
Picture
This is the report of the remarkable interview which Sheikh Abdullah gave to a British journalist in 1949 in which he spoke of the option of an independent Kashmir. According to H.L Saxena (in The Tragedy of Kashmir, published in 1975), the Times of India spotted the story and wrote it up, which in turn prompted an angry Sardar Patel to upbraid Sheikh Abdullah. But it's also an indication that Sheikh Abdullah's interest in independence had been germinating for some years prior to his dismissal as Jammu and Kashmir's prime minister and arrest in August 1953.

The interview was conducted by Michael Davidson, who worked mainly for the Observer - though this article appeared in the Scotsman of 14 April 1949. It is a hugely interesting interview - for Sheikh Abdullah's comments about independence, neutrality and communist influence.

The page lay-out means that a few lines have, in the image above, been missed off both columns. For the record, the first column concludes with these additional words:

'autocracy: our sympathies went to the Indian Congress, because Congress supported the struggle of the peoples of the States against Princely autocracy. Jinnah's Moslem League didn't - its leaders backed the rulers of Hyderabad and Bhopal against the people's democratic movement, because these Princes were communally-minded and, therefore, Pakistan's greatest supporters.'

The second column concludes:

 'they do not say so publicly) are resigned to the principle of partition - so is India. A neutral Vale of Kashmir would remove the [illegible]  of those leaders, like Nehru, with vision and genuine concern for the welfare of the common people, are likely to examine the plan objectively and without rancour.'



1 Comment

    Resources

    For those interested in Kashmir's history, here are some resources which will be of interest and value ... and please offer documents, images, photographs.

    Archives

    March 2021
    October 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    July 2017
    February 2016

    Categories

    All
    Abdul Samad Khan Achakzai
    Amar Singh
    Andrew Whitehead
    Badshah Khan
    Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad
    Charles Bradlaugh
    Chittaprosad
    Emergency Administration
    Freda Bedi
    Independence
    Indian National Congress
    Indira Gandhi
    Jawaharlal Nehru
    Kashmir Men's Militia
    Marianne
    Michael Davidson
    Mridula Sarabhai
    National Conference
    National Conference Flag
    New Kashmir
    Pathe Newsreel
    Pratap Singh
    Quit Kashmir
    Scotsman
    Sheikh Abdullah
    Tara Devi
    Through Blood Sweat & Tears
    Women's Self Defence Corps

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly